Home/Countries/Panama/Broad Money (% of GDP)

Panama—Broad Money (% of GDP)

Category: Fiscal & MonetarySource: World Bank World Development Indicators ↗Series years: 2000–2008
Latest Value
76.2%
2008
YoY Change
-3.3%
2007 → 2008
Maximum
82.5%
2001
Minimum
72.5%
2005
CAGR
-0.3%
9 years
Last
76.2%
Previous
78.8%
Highest
82.5%
Lowest
72.5%
Unit
% of GDP
Source
World Bank World Development Indicators

Panama's broad money (% of GDP) was 76.2% in 2008. This represents a -3.3% change from 2007. Over the past 9 years, the highest recorded value was 82.5% (2001) and the lowest was 72.5% (2005). Data sourced from the World Bank World Development Indicators.

Source: World Bank World Development Indicators

Historical Data

YearValueChange
200876.2%-3.3%
200778.8%-0.3%
200679.0%+8.9%
200572.5%-1.4%
200473.6%-2.7%
200375.6%-2.6%
200277.6%-5.9%
200182.5%+5.4%
200078.3%

Top Countries — Broad Money (% of GDP)

#CountryValueYear
1Hong Kong SAR, China481.0%2025
2Japan246.8%2025
3China227.7%2024
4Macao SAR, China201.2%2025
5Korea, Rep.162.7%2024
6Singapore148.6%2020
7Mauritius142.3%2025
8United Kingdom141.9%2024
9Thailand141.0%2024
10Viet Nam136.3%2022
View all 146 countries →

About This Indicator

Definition

Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.

Methodology

Data compiled by International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF); World Development Indicators Database, World Bank (WB); National Accounts data files, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Unit

% of GDP

Source: World Bank (World Development Indicators)Available series: 2000–2008View original source →