Home/Countries/Côte d'Ivoire/Military Spending (% of GDP)

Côte d'Ivoire—Military Spending (% of GDP)

Category: MilitarySource: World Bank World Development Indicators ↗Global Rank: #131 of 156Series years: 2003–2025
Latest Value
0.8%
2025
YoY Change
+1.5%
2024 → 2025
Global Rank
#131
of 156 countries
Maximum
1.3%
2009
Minimum
0.8%
2024
CAGR
-1.2%
23 years
Last
0.8%
Previous
0.8%
Highest
1.3%
Lowest
0.8%
Unit
% of GDP
Source
World Bank World Development Indicators

Côte d'Ivoire's military spending (% of GDP) was 0.8% in 2025, ranking #131 out of 156 countries. This represents a +1.5% change from 2024. Over the past 23 years, the highest recorded value was 1.3% (2009) and the lowest was 0.8% (2024). Data sourced from the World Bank World Development Indicators.

Cote d'Ivoire — Military Spending (% of GDP): 0.7748750664 % of GDP for reference year 2025. Source: World Bank (World Development Indicators). Reference year does not establish final observed status; publisher vintage is not verified here.
Source: World Bank World Development Indicators

Historical Data

YearValueChange
20250.8%+1.5%
20240.8%-11.8%
20230.9%-0.0%
20220.9%-1.3%
20210.9%-9.0%
20201.0%+8.5%
20190.9%-14.6%
20181.0%+7.6%
20171.0%-22.5%
20161.2%+0.2%
20151.2%+16.5%
20141.1%+7.3%
20131.0%-9.6%
20121.1%+9.3%
20111.0%-10.7%
20101.1%-10.0%
20091.3%+13.6%
20081.1%-4.3%
20071.2%+5.9%
20061.1%+2.7%
20051.1%-3.5%
20041.1%+8.9%
20031.0%

Top Countries — Military Spending (% of GDP)

#CountryValueYear
1Ukraine39.6%2025
2Algeria8.8%2025
3Israel7.8%2025
4Russia7.5%2025
5Myanmar6.6%2024
6Qatar6.5%2022
7Saudi Arabia6.5%2025
8Azerbaijan6.5%2025
9Armenia6.1%2025
10Oman5.7%2025
View all 156 countries →

About This Indicator

Definition

Military expenditure by country as percentage of gross domestic product

Methodology

Data compiled by SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), uri: https://www.sipri.org/databases.

Unit

% of GDP

Source: World Bank (World Development Indicators)Available series: 2003–2025View original source →