Viet Nam—Labor Force Participation (%)
Category: LaborSource: World Bank World Development IndicatorsGlobal Rank: #24 of 187
Latest Value
72.8%
2025
YoY Change
-0.5%
2024 → 2025
Global Rank
#24
of 187 countries
Maximum
77.5%
2018
Minimum
72.8%
2025
CAGR
-0.0%
26 years
Last
72.8%
Previous
73.1%
Highest
77.5%
Lowest
72.8%
Source
World Bank World Development Indicators
Source: World Bank World Development Indicators
Historical Data
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72.8% | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 73.1% | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 73.5% | -1.3% |
| 2022 | 74.5% | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 73.7% | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 74.4% | -2.9% |
| 2019 | 76.6% | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 77.5% | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 77.2% | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 77.0% | -0.6% |
| 2015 | 77.4% | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 77.3% | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 77.2% | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 76.3% | -0.1% |
| 2011 | 76.4% | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 76.3% | +0.3% |
| 2009 | 76.0% | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 75.6% | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 75.0% | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 74.6% | +0.5% |
| 2005 | 74.2% | +0.4% |
| 2004 | 74.0% | -0.1% |
| 2003 | 74.1% | -0.4% |
| 2002 | 74.4% | -0.7% |
| 2001 | 74.9% | +2.1% |
| 2000 | 73.4% |
Top Countries — Labor Force Participation (%)
| # | Country | Value | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qatar | 87.0% | 2025 |
| 2 | Madagascar | 85.5% | 2025 |
| 3 | Solomon Islands | 84.3% | 2025 |
| 4 | Tanzania | 83.7% | 2025 |
| 5 | Nigeria | 82.5% | 2025 |
| 6 | Cambodia | 82.4% | 2025 |
| 7 | Korea, Dem. People's Rep. | 82.2% | 2025 |
| 8 | Uganda | 80.0% | 2025 |
| 9 | Niger | 79.7% | 2025 |
| 10 | Mozambique | 78.7% | 2025 |
About This Indicator
Definition
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 15 and older that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period.
Methodology
Data compiled by ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), uri: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/bulk/, publisher: ILOSTAT, type: external database, date accessed: January 17, 2026.
Source: World Bank - World Development IndicatorsView original source →